Free EMR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to EMR and HIPAA for FREE!!

Medical Data Impact to Financial Health, Disability and Job Protection – #HITsm Chat Topic

Posted on November 7, 2017 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

We’re excited to share the topic and questions for this week’s #HITsm chat happening Friday, 11/10 at Noon ET (9 AM PT). This week’s chat will be hosted by Kimberly George (@kimberlyanngeo) from @sedgwick on the topic of “Medical Data Impact to Financial Health, Disability and Job Protection.”

Short term disability, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and similar leave of absence programs – including workers’ compensation – are designed to ensure the employment and income of the American worker is protected at a time of illness or injury. Regardless as to whether an employee is seeking wage reimbursement, a leave of absence, or a job accommodation, sufficient, accurate and timely medical documentation is required.

But what happens when accurate medical documentation is not received? Is incomplete? Or not received on a timely basis? The request for benefits is placed in a pending or denied status, wages are not paid or significantly delayed, and challenges mount for the patient.

While the burden to submit medical records, and supporting documentation falls to the patient, there is an uptick in payer and employer interest to help solve for the challenges of obtaining sufficient medical information on a timely basis. Medical documentation often requires diagnosis, subjective and objective medical information, including an assessment of functionality pertinent to the patient’s physical capabilities. This functional assessment is often defined by the benefit plan, law, and the employer’s policy.

Receipt of medical information on a timely basis is a major factor in the denial of disability benefits for people seeking support for a disability, leave of absence or workers compensation claim. Number one reason for a reversal of the denial is late receipt of the medical documentation.

The objective of this chat is for #HITsm community to share their insight, ideas and opinions about the identification, collection, and sharing of a patient’s medical and functional status with proper release of information to the payer directly. Quite simply, how can technology, process, policy and people speed up the process so patients and payers have the medical records needed to make accurate, timely and fair benefit decisions?

Reference Materials:

Join us as we dive into this topic during this week’s #HITsm chat using the following questions.

Topics for This Week’s #HITsm Chat:

T1: What issues, obstacles and/or missing capabilities prevent or hinder an individual’s ability to collect their medical records? #HITsm

T2: How are patients impacted when benefit approval requires medical documentation and medical records are not available? #HITsm

T3: How can patients, support networks, employers, government or others support the capture, storage & retrieval of medical records? #HITsm

T4: What technologies and/or new approaches can assist w/ capture, storage & retrieval of medical record data? #HITsm

T5: What reasonable policy and/or regulatory changes could be implemented to accelerate & expedite benefit processing on behalf of consumers? #HITsm

Bonus: What stakeholders, resources, & companies should be engaged to assist w/ building & delivering a medical records collection solution? #HITsm

Upcoming #HITsm Chat Schedule
11/17 – MACRA/MIPS: Chutes & Ladders 2.0
Hosted by Jim Tate (@jimtate) from EMR Advocate and MIPS Consulting.

11/24 – Thanksgiving Break!

12/1 – Using Technology to Fight EHR Burnout
Hosted by Gabe Charbonneau, MD (@gabrieldane)

12/8 – TBD
Hosted by Homer Chin (@chinhom) and Amy Fellows (@afellowsamy) from @MyOpenNotes)

12/15 – TBD
Hosted by David Fuller (@genkidave)

We look forward to learning from the #HITsm community! As always, let us know if you’d like to host a future #HITsm chat or if you know someone you think we should invite to host.

If you’re searching for the latest #HITsm chat, you can always find the latest #HITsm chat and schedule of chats here.

HIM Departments Need More Support

Posted on July 16, 2015 I Written By

Anne Zieger is a healthcare journalist who has written about the industry for 30 years. Her work has appeared in all of the leading healthcare industry publications, and she's served as editor in chief of several healthcare B2B sites.

As both a contributor to this blog, and an assertive, activist patient managing chronic conditions, I get to see both sides of professional health information management.  And I have to say that while health data management pros obviously do great things against great odds, support for their work doesn’t seem to have trickled down to the front lines.  I’m speaking most specifically about Medical Records (oops, I mean Health Information Management) departments in hospitals.

As I noted in a related blog post, I recently had a small run-in with the HIM department of a local hospital which seems emblematic of this problem. The snag occurred when I reached out to DC-based Sibley Memorial Hospital and tried to get a new log-in code for their implementation of Epic PHR MyChart. The clerk answering the phone for that department told me, quite inaccurately, that if I didn’t use the activation code provided on my discharge summary papers within two days, my chance to log in to the Johns Hopkins MyChart site was forever lost. (Sibley is part of the Johns Hopkins system.)

Being the pushy type that I am, I complained to management, who put me in touch with the MyChart tech support office. The very smart and help tech support staffer who reached out to me expressed surprise at what I’d been told as a) the code wasn’t yet expired and b) given that I supplied the right security information she’d have been able to supply me with a new one.  The thing is, I never would have gotten to her if I hadn’t known not to take the HIM clerk’s word at face value.

Note: After writing the linked article, I was able to speak to the HIM department leader at Sibley, and she told me that she planned to address the issue of supporting MyChart questions with her entire staff. She seemed to agree completely that they had a vital role in the success of the PHR and patient empowerment generally, and I commend her for that.

Now, I realize that HIM departments are facing what may be the biggest changes in their history, and that Madame Clerk may have been an anomaly or even a temp. But assuming she was a regular hire, how much training would it have taken for the department managers to require her to simply give out the MyChart tech support number? Ten minutes?  Five? A priority e-mail demanding that PHR/digital medical record calls be routed this way would probably have done the trick.

My take on all of this is that HIM departments seem to have a lot of growing up to do. Responsible largely for pushing paper — very important paper but paper nonetheless — they’re now in the thick of the health data revolution without having a central role in it. They aren’t attached to the IT department, really, nor are they directly supporting physicians — they’re sort of a legacy department that hasn’t got as clearly defined a role as it did.

I’m not suggesting that HIM departments be wiped off the map, but it seems to me that some aggressive measures are in order to loop them in to today’s world.

Obviously, training on patient health data access is an issue. If HIM staffers know more about patient portals generally — and ideally, have hands-on experience with them, they’ll be in a better position to support such initiatives without needing to parrot facts blindly. In other words, they’ll do better if they have context.

HIM departments should also be well informed as to EMR and other health data system developments. Sure, the senior people in the department may already be looped in, but they should share that knowledge at brown bag lunches and staff update sessions freely and often. As I see it, this provides the team with much-needed sense of participation in the broader HIT enterprise.

Also, HIM staff members should encourage patients who call to log in and leverage patient portals. Patients who call the hospital with only a vague sense that they can access their health data online will get routed to that department by the switchboard. HIM needs to be well prepared to support them.

These concerns should only become more important as Meaningful Use Stage 3 comes on deck. MU Stage 3 should provide the acid test as to whether whether hospital HIM departments are really ready to embrace change.

Ring in 2015 – Ring Out MD Myths about ICD-10

Posted on January 7, 2015 I Written By

The following is a guest blog post by Wendy Coplan-Gould, Founder and President of HRS Coding.

Physicians see ICD-10 as a mixed bag of distraction, expense and long-term advantages. They’ve heard grossly exaggerated messages about ICD-10’s complexity and cost. Confusion has led to complacency and obstinacy across physician practices and medical groups.

Conversely, some physician practices and medical groups eagerly await ICD-10’s ability to accurately describe their high-risk patients, improve data mining capabilities, and demonstrate complexity of cases. The opportunity for cleaner data, better quality scores and greater patient safety are three more physician-friendly benefits of ICD-10 as described in my previous ICD-10 post on EMR & HIPAA.

Recent research conducted with a 20-physician focus group, and presented during AHIMA’s 2014 Convention & Exhibit, revealed three common themes with regard to physician perceptions of ICD-10 and its effect on their practices.

Physicians are concerned about the following:

  • How specific their clinical documentation has to be for correct ICD-10 code assignment.
  • Obtaining accurate reimbursement under ICD-10.
  • Receiving ICD-10 training from the hospitals they serve.

With the advent of a new year, now is the time for hospitals and healthcare systems to dispel physician myths about ICD-10 and actively engage practices—one medical group at a time.

Five ICD-10 Realities and Physician Engagement Strategies

Is ICD-10 as difficult for doctors as once portrayed? The resounding answer for 2015 is “no.”

When introduced one physician office at a time, the implementation of ICD-10 is relatively easy. Consider these proven strategies to foster greater physician buy-in for ICD-10.

  • Most physicians will only use a small subset of ICD-10 codes—dramatically decreasing the amount of time required for training and preparation (1-2 days). Target training efforts toward the 80 percent of diagnosis and procedure codes that are used repeatedly within each practice or specialty.
  • When hospitals focus on improving EHR documentation templates, physicians are more productive, efficient and engaged in ICD-10 efforts. Foster inclusion by helping physicians build better documentation templates across all EHR applications.
  • Physicians learn best from other physicians. Find physician documentation champions within each specialty and make ICD-10 learning fun.
  • The best way to minimize claims denials and ensure proper reimbursement for both hospitals and physicians under ICD-10 will be the avoidance of non-specific codes. Focus on helping physicians document better and give them tools such as real-time documentation aides and prompts to create more succinct, accurate and complete clinical documentation.
  • Physician practices must also be included in end-to-end testing for ICD-10. Be sure to include them within your organization-wide testing plans. Even when testing is only for payer acknowledgement, it provides segue for physician practice coding and billing staff to practice submitting ICD-10 codes.

Blaze a New Path with Physicians in 2015

Last year left many hospitals feeling defeated regarding ICD-10 and their physician preparedness efforts. Money was spent and staff resources were exhausted. Congress dealt a devastating blow to ICD-10 budgets, timelines and implementation teams.

But the ship hasn’t sailed. There is still time to actively engage your medical staff in preparing for ICD-10. Erase your original message to physicians that ICD-10 is difficult and expensive. Replace it with knowledge gleaned over the past two years, recent physician research, and new implementation timelines based on specialty.

By focusing on the clinical data advantages of ICD-10 and bolstering physician productivity and efficiency, hospitals can blaze a new path toward the new code set—one practice at a time.

About Wendy Coplan-Gould
Wendy Coplan-Gould is the embodiment of HRS. She has led the HIM consulting and outsourcing company since 1979, through up and down economies and every significant regulatory twist and turn of the last three decades. Long-time clients and new clients alike are on a first-name basis with her and benefit from her focus on excellence, reliability and flexibility. She has been published in the Journal of AHIMA and other recognized publications, as well as conducted countless professional association presentations.

Prior to starting HRS, Wendy served as assistant director, then director, of Health Information Management at Baltimore City Hospital. She also was associate director of the Maryland Resource Center, which provided data for Maryland’s Health Services Cost Review Commission, an early adopter of the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) methodology. Wendy is available via email:

A Few Thoughts After AHIMA About the HIM Profession

Posted on September 30, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

This year was my 4th year attending the AHIMA Convention. There was definitely a different vibe this year at AHIMA than has been at previous AHIMA Annual Convention. I still saw the humble and wonderful people that work in the HIM field. I also still saw a passion for the HIM work from many as well. However, there seemed to be an overall feeling from many that they were evaluating the future of HIM and what it means for healthcare, for their organization, and for them personally.

This shouldn’t really come as a surprise. Think about the evolution that’s been happening in the HIM world. First, they got broadsided by $36 billion of stimulus money that slapped EHR systems in their organizations which questioned HIM’s role in this new digital world. Then, last year they got smashed by a few lines in a bill which delayed ICD-10 another year. It’s fair to say that it’s been a tumultuous few years for the HIM profession as they consider their place in the healthcare ecosystem.

While a little bit battered and scarred, at AHIMA I still saw the same passion and love for the work these HIM professionals do. I might add, a work they do with very little recognition outside of places like AHIMA. In fact, when EHR systems started being put in place, I think that many organizations wondered if they’d need their HIM staff in the future. A number of years into the world of EHRs, I think it’s become abundantly clear in every organization that the HIM staff still have extremely important roles in an organization.

While EHR software has certainly changed the nature of the work an HIM professional does, there is still plenty of work that needs to be done. We’d all love for the EHR to automate our entire healthcare lives, but it’s just not going to happen. In fact, in many ways, EHR software complicates the work that’s done by HIM staff. Remember that great HIM modules, features, and functions don’t sell more EHR software (more on that in future posts). Sadly, the HIM functions are often an afterthought in EHR development. We’ll see if that catches up with the EHR vendors.

As I’ve dived deeper into the life and work of an HIM professional, I’ve seen how difficult and detailed the job really can be. Not to mention, the negative consequences an organization can experience if they don’t have their HIM house in order. Just think about a few of the top functions: Release of Information, Medical Coding, Security and Compliance. All of these can have a tremendous impact for good or bad on an organization.

What is clear to me is that the HIM professional has moved well beyond managing medical records. If done well, the HIM functions can play a really important part in any healthcare organization. The challenge that many HIM professionals face is adapting to this changing environment. I see a number of real stand out professionals that are doing phenomenal things in their organization and really have an important voice. However, I still see far too many who aren’t adapting and many who quite frankly don’t want to adapt. I think this will come back to bite them in the end.

Unfinished Business: More HIPAA Guidelines to Come

Posted on August 4, 2014 I Written By

The following is a guest blog post by Rita Bowen, Sr. Vice President of HIM and Privacy Officer at HealthPort.

After all of the hullabaloo since the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) release of the HIPAA Omnibus, it’s humbling to realize that the work is not complete. While the Omnibus covered a lot of territory in providing new guidelines for the privacy and security of electronic health records, the Final Rule failed to address three key pieces of legislation that are of great relevance to healthcare providers.

The three areas include the “minimum necessary” standard; whistleblower compensation; and revised parameters for electronic health information (EHI) access logs. No specific timetable has been provided for the release of revised legislation.

Minimum Necessary

The minimum necessary standard requires providers to “take reasonable steps to limit the use or disclosure of, and requests for, protected health information to the minimum necessary to accomplish the intended purpose.”

This requires that the intent of the request and the review of the health information be matched to assure that only the minimum information intended for the authorized release be provided. To date, HHS has conducted a variety of evaluations and is in the process of assessing that data.

Whistleblower Compensation

The second bit of unfinished legislation is a proposed rule being considered by HHS that would dramatically increase the payment to Medicare fraud whistleblowers. If adopted, the program, called the Medicare Incentive Reward Program (IRP), will raise payments from a current maximum of $1,000 to nearly $10 million.

I believe that the added incentive will create heightened sensitivity to fraud and that more individuals will be motivated to act. People are cognizant of fraudulent situations but they have lacked the incentive to report, unless they are deeply disgruntled.

Per the proposed plan, reports of fraud can be made by simply making a phone call to the correct reporting agency which should facilitate whistleblowing.

Access Logs

The third, and most contentious, area of concern is with EHI access logs. The proposed legislation calls for a single log to be created and provided to the patient, that would contain all instances of access to the patient’s EHI, no matter the system or situation.

From a patient perspective, the log would be unwieldy, cumbersome and extremely difficult to decipher for the patient’s needs. An even more worrisome aspect is that of the privacy of healthcare workers.

Employees sense that their own privacy would be invaded if regulations require that their information, including their names and other personal identifiers, are shared as part of the accessed record.  Many healthcare workers have raised concern regarding their own safety if this information is openly made available. This topic has received a tremendous amount of attention.

In discussion are alternate plans that would negotiate the content of access logs, tailoring them to contain appropriate data regarding the person in question by the patient while still satisfying patients and protecting the privacy of providers.

The Value of Data Governance

Most of my conversations circle back to the value of information (or data) governance. This situation of unfinished EHI design and management is no different. Once released the new legislation for the “minimum necessary” standard, whistleblower compensation and revised parameters for medical access logs must be woven into your existing information governance plan.

Information governance is authority and control—the planning, monitoring and enforcement—of your data assets, which could be compromised if all of the dots are not connected. Organizations should be using this time to build the appropriate foundation to their EHI.

About the Author:
Rita Bowen, MA, RHIA, CHPS, SSGB

Ms. Bowen is a distinguished professional with 20+ years of experience in the health information management industry.  She serves as the Sr. Vice President of HIM and Privacy Officer of HealthPort where she is responsible for acting as an internal customer advocate.  Most recently, Ms. Bowen served as the Enterprise Director of HIM Services for Erlanger Health System for 13 years, where she received commendation from the hospital county authority for outstanding leadership.  Ms. Bowen is the recipient of Mentor FORE Triumph Award and Distinguished Member of AHIMA’s Quality Management Section.  She has served as the AHIMA President and Board Chair in 2010, a member of AHIMA’s Board of Directors (2006-2011), the Council on Certification (2003-2005) and various task groups including CHP exam and AHIMA’s liaison to HIMSS for the CHS exam construction (2002).

Ms. Bowen is an established speaker on diverse HIM topics and an active author on privacy and legal health records.  She served on the CCHIT security and reliability workgroup and as Chair of Regional Committees East-Tennessee HIMSS and co-chair of Tennessee’s e-HIM group.  She is an adjunct faculty member of the Chattanooga State HIM program and UT Memphis HIM Master’s program.  She also serves on the advisory board for Care Communications based in Chicago, Illinois.

EHR and Malpractice Lawsuits

Posted on January 23, 2013 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

Long time reader Carl recently pointed me to this excellent AHIMA article on EHR and Malpractice Lawsuits. It’s first section sums up the current state of EHR and lawsuits quite well:

Medical records are a vital part of any healthcare lawsuit because they document what happened during treatment. Paper medical records are relatively simple aspects of litigation. HIM staff pull the requested chart, track down additional information as necessary, and sometimes provide a deposition on the record’s accuracy.

The process is far more complex with an EHR. The record of a patient’s care that a clinician views on screen may not exist in that form anywhere else. When the information is taken out of the system and submitted into legal proceedings, the court has a very different view—one that often confuses the proceedings and, in the worst instances, raises suspicions about the record’s validity.

The challenges stem from the design of the systems, which were built for care—not court. If the provider struggles in providing documentation, a trial involving malpractice can easily shift its focus from an examination of care to a fault-finding mission with the recordkeeping system. At other times, the provider’s inability to put forward the information in a comprehensible format may raise suspicions that it is missing, withholding, or obscuring information.

I’d probably modify the sentence that says that EHR’s were “built for care-not court” to say that EHR’s were “built for billing-not court”, but the idea is still the same. The big issues for EHR in lawsuits is that there’s no really good precedent for how an EHR will be treated in court. We’re so early in the process of legal cases that use EHR documentation, that we just don’t know how the courts are going to deal with EHR documentation.

Plus, when you consider that there are 300+ EHR companies out there, I’m not sure that a legal case with one EHR software is going to be applied the same way to the other EHR software. Each EHR displays data differently. Each EHR audits users differently. Each EHR stores data differently. So, I expect that each EHR will be looked at in a different way.

The AHIMA article linked above is a good read for those interested in this topic and points out a lot of other issues that could face an HIM staff that’s dealing with a case involving documentation in an EHR. Although, one of the overriding messages is that HIM staff and healthcare organizations are going to need an expert of their EHR involved in the process. In fact, I can see many HIM departments getting trained up on EHR in order to fulfill this need.

What I also see coming is a new group of EHR expert witnesses. Again, I think that these expert witnesses will have to have specific knowledge of a particular EHR to be really effective. I’m sure they’ll come from the ranks of EHR consultants, former EHR employees, and some EHR users. Considering the millions of dollars on the line in these malpractice cases, these EHR expert witnesses stand to make a lot of money.

I don’t want to make it all sound doom and gloom. I expect that there will be many cases involving EHR where a doctor or institution is covered better by an EHR than they were in the paper world. This will be even more true as EHR vendors continue to shore up their EHR audit logs and processes. There’s new legal risks with EHR, but there are also old risks that are removed by using an EHR. We just need to make sure we’re ready for the new risks.

HIM Staff and EHR Implementations

Posted on August 1, 2012 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

I got into a recent discussion about the role of HIM professionals in an EHR implementation. I thought this was also a timely post since I got a request today to again attend the AHIMA annual conference. I had such a good time at the AHIMA conference last year, that it looks like I’m going to attend AHIMA 2012 in Chicago, but I digress.

In response to the discussion about the HIM professionals role in EHR implementations, I offered the following comment:

I think they’re an essential part of the implementation. The place I see them most used is in how to deal with the old paper charts. The challenge is usually turning them on the idea that they’re useful and valuable even in an EHR world. Many just assume (incorrectly) that their job is gone. It’s not, but it does change.

Just a few places where they will still have to be involved post EHR implementation can include:
-ROI (Release of Information) from the EHR and the old paper charts
-Scanning Loose Paper into EHR (or overseeing that process)
-Quality Checking (similar to paper chart audits)

I’m sure there are more, but those are a few off the top of my head.

Personally, I loved talking with our HIM staff during our EHR implementation. In many ways they were a great “sanity” check for me. They weren’t afraid to point out things that I may not have considered. I did feel bad, because I could tell that the HIM director always felt like HIM wasn’t really listened to during the EHR implementation. I can’t speak for some of the other clinical leadership, but I was always grateful for the role that HIM played in the EHR implementation.

An Outsiders First Perspective of AHIMA 11

Posted on October 4, 2011 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of and John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

This being my first time to attend the AHIMA Annual Conference I thought I’d do a post talking about my experience for those who haven’t attended. Plus, a look at some of the major topics of discussion that I’m sure to write about in the near future.

I must admit that it feels like a very different conference for someone who’s use to attending conferences in the predominantly male driven IT world. I’m certainly not complaining about it at all, but it is interesting to see the subtle differences based upon the predominantly female AHIMA attendees. For example, I have a bottle of nail polish in my pocket from 3M. That’s definitely something you wouldn’t find at a male dominated IT conference. Although, even I as a male took one for my daughter. Can you imagine how much she’ll love me for it?

I must admit that I’m still a little torn about the AHIMA conference, because I can’t help but wonder how many of the AHIMA members really exert influence over decision makers in their organization. This was partially highlighted to me by the choice of AHIMA keynotes which focus on leadership. It seems that AHIMA is making an effort to help their members become leaders in their organization and not just “worker bees.”

I’m sure my perspective is tainted a little bit when I think back to times where I’ve seen some of my HIM friends come back from conferences that taught them about EMR. They have all this energy about the interesting technologies or new products, but they far too often say something like, “Not that anyone cares, since they won’t really listen to me about EHR.” I really hope that this is a rather broad generalization. Plus, while it might be true that many in healthcare don’t listen as highly to HIM (or doctors in many cases) when it comes to EHR, I think HIM does have more of a voice when it comes to things like managing Release of Information, ICD-10, document imaging, etc.

The micro industries that exist has been one of the interesting things I’ve found at AHIMA. For example, there’s some really interesting and relatively large companies working in the Release of Information space. It’s quite amazing to me to see something so niche be so successful.

One thing I have really enjoyed about the people at AHIMA is how supportive they are of each other. There seem to be really tight bonds and great relationships between those that attend.

Overall I’ve really enjoyed my AHIMA experience so far. I’ve only been able to attend one session (see my post on EMR and EHR about the Healthcare Social Media session I attended), but the people I’ve met have been interesting and beneficial. I guess that’s true for most conferences. It’s all about the people.