EMR vs Tumblr, EMR Issues, and Improving Care

As we do almost every weekend (every other week on EMR and EHR), we like to take a look at some interesting tweets that we find related to EMR and health IT. We have a bunch of spicy tweets this week that I think each start an important conversation.


My first gut reaction was to laugh. It’s nice that someone is using Tumblr as their therapy for EMR issues. Although, my second reaction is to be a little frustrated that an EMR would be so poorly designed that you could close your EMR in the middle of a report and it wouldn’t be saved. Of course, this isn’t surprising to me since I’ve seen hundreds of EMR, but it is still sad that it’s the state of EMR software today. Imagine if Word was still that way today.


I think this is an important discussion. I think there are workarounds that help this situation. We’ve written about many of them over the years. However, it definitely takes some good design to make the patient the center of the work you do as a doctor and not the EMR.


I love the irony of Farzad’s statement. The real challenge with this idea is that humans can adjust and learn over time much better than computers. At least in the short term. We’ll see how that plays out in the long term as the volume of information that needs to be processed can’t be handled by the human brain.

About the author

John Lynn

John Lynn is the Founder of HealthcareScene.com, a network of leading Healthcare IT resources. The flagship blog, Healthcare IT Today, contains over 13,000 articles with over half of the articles written by John. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 20 million times.

John manages Healthcare IT Central, the leading career Health IT job board. He also organizes the first of its kind conference and community focused on healthcare marketing, Healthcare and IT Marketing Conference, and a healthcare IT conference, EXPO.health, focused on practical healthcare IT innovation. John is an advisor to multiple healthcare IT companies. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can be found on Twitter: @techguy.

5 Comments

  • I’ll speak to @jearch’s remark:
    I don’t know her specific situation, but I’ve seen so many (all?) docs drop their transcribers was they go to EHR…then they wonder why they are typing all the time.

    An EHR doesn’t magically read your mind. Keeping your transcriber can be just as helpful as before you had an EHR.

    I was recently called into an office of a doc who felt he wasn’t using his EHR efficient enough.

    I watched as he explained his patient interaction.

    After the exam, he has the patient come to his office where they discuss what he saw.

    First, he was using an old XP computer with 2gb RAM…half the EHR minimum recommendation…and he was frustrated with the speed.

    Second, his patient sat across his desk, while his computer and monitor were on a table behind his desk, so the docs back was to the patient while looking at the EHR.

    Theses are basic things that can be fixed, yet I get the feeling that somehow docs think that just having an EHR “fixes” things. There is actually a lot more to it.

  • I see two major issues of irresponsibility here:

    1. Why does the facility these tweeters are working at allow them to tweet at all?

    Why isn’t twitter, along with FaceBook, and all of the other social media sites, blocked from access on the facility’s networks?

    Having worked in the healthcare industry for close to 15 years, I have seen some really stupid things done by medical professionals who had access to eBay, FaceBook, Twitter, and other social media outlets while they were at work:

    The anesthesiologist who left the patient in the OR so he could go check on his eBay auction. That was the straw which broke the proverbial camel’s back and caused me to lock down the entire inside network. When my then boss challenged me as to why I locked it down, I told the boss that I didn’t want to testify when the patient, or patient’s family sued.

    All of the medical facilities I work with, or with which I consult now block access to ALL TICKETING, AUCTION and SOCIAL MEDIA WEBSITES on their staff and public websites.

    Patient privacy and safety come FIRST – above and beyond the need of any one individual to satisfy his or her urge to make a public comment, stand in line on a website to purchase tickets or to check the status of an auction.

    I’m sorry, but as someone who is entrusted with the guardianship of medical and financial records in my day-to-day activities as a network administrator, I will never allow anyone to jeopardize either the safety of the patient, or the integrity and safety of the patient data.

    2. Why isn’t the facility using the EHR the way most EHR software was intended to be used: INTERACTIVELY, with the doctor, nurse or staff member simultaneously entering data and making notes while they are interviewing, diagnosing or treating the patient?

    With a properly coded EHR program, proper training of the staff by the facility, and proper use of the program by the staff: whether doctor, nurse, staff member or other practitioner, a well designed EHR software program will actually enhance the patient’s visit or procedure because it can be used SIMULTANEOUSLY to the interaction with the patient!

    The proper utilization of well written EHR software will bring several benefits, to both the practice and the patient:

    – it will allow the medical professional to do a more thorough job of diagnosis or, and provide better treatment to, the patient because the medical professional will have all of the patient’s history in front of them at the time of the interview or interaction;

    – it will, in many cases, alert the medical professional to patients who are scamming or playing the system to gain access to unnecessary or illegal procedures or medications;

    – it will allow the medical professional to better use his or her time because he or she can be entering diagnosis, comments, notes, and data gleaned from the patient in real time, vs trying to remember it or transcribe it at a later time. The transcription process is one of the most frequent causes for error or delays and by eliminating that process many errors are eliminated immediately – without ever taking place;

    – by the medical professional entering data in real time, the overall safety and care of the patient is significantly enhanced and, ultimately, the reputation of the medical facility goes up and the liabilities go down.

  • John Brewer,
    That might be one of the best comments you’ve done and that’s saying something considering the many quality comments you’ve made before. It almost feels banal to talk about some of the things you mention, but so many doctors are still dealing with those simple things.

    Bruce,
    I really appreciate your desire to protect the patients. It’s admirable and I wish everyone in healthcare had that same perspective. However, I think you have to be careful that you don’t take those policies too far. If you go too far, then you end up with your staff in the bathroom on their phone doing all the things you mention. Or on their phone in the hallway. I’m fine with thoughtful restricting, but it also has to be paired with good education of what’s the smart actions to take because you can’t lock everything down. That’s when education matters.

  • Thanks for your response, John.

    While I understand your concerns, regarding the fact that staff will simply find another way to access social media, the lockdowns I mentioned are not pretty much the norm at most of the larger hospitals I deal with in the Chicago area.

    In larger cities, on large hospital campuses, it’s not really a big deal because the hospitals are keenly aware of the implications of not paying attention to the patient and are now training their staff accordingly.

    I would call your attention to the top two hospitals, especially the number two contender, listed at the most recent US News and World Reports issue on hospitals and then take a good look at their policies with regard to employee and staff access to non-medical resources on the internet. The employees and staff are basically locked out while at work, except on their own devices and then, only during lunch or break times.

    How the safety of patient data is handled is up to the individual facility, but my personal preference is that the patient’s safety, confidentiality and healthcare comes above everything else.

  • When I consult with an office, I too recommend a lock down of sitea as Bruce mentions.

    I also highly recommend that IF they maintain a social media site, they do NOT make posts to it from the office. In fact, they should have a well thought out process for pre-writing posts.
    Why?
    The smartest people say the dumbest things on social media, usually in the heat of the moment.
    For a medical practice to take this risk is poor decision making.

    Additionally, the security issues that can come about from the various social sites can be a problem.

    Did somebody say productivity? I did.

    If a staffer is going to use their smart phone to do these things, that is much better than from an office computer – issues are segregated.

    I don’t believe it is asking too much of your employees to stay off social media during the work day.

    I’m well aware many curse my name after implementing this policy, and I’m OK with this.

Click here to post a comment
   

Categories