Free EMR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to EMR and HIPAA for FREE!!

Healthcare AI Needs a Breadth and Depth of Data

Posted on May 17, 2018 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

Today I’m enjoying the New England HIMSS Spring Conference including an amazing keynote session by Dale Sanders from Health Catalyst. Next week I’ll be following up this blog post with some other insights that Dale shared at the New England HIMSS event, but today I just wanted to highlight one powerful concept that he shared:

Healthcare AI Needs a Breadth and Depth of Data

As part of this idea, Dale shared the following image to illustrate how much data is really needed for AI to effectively assess our health:

Dale pointed out that in healthcare today we really only have access to the data in the bottom right corner. That’s not enough data for AI to be able to properly assess someone’s health. Dale also suggested the following about EHR data:

Long story short, the EHR data is not going to be enough to truly assess someone’s health. As Google recently proved, a simple algorithm with more data is much more powerful than a sophisticated algorithm with less data. While we think we have a lot of data in healthcare, we really don’t have that much data. Dale Sanders made a great case for why we need more data if we want AI to be effective in healthcare.

What are you doing in your organization to collect data? What are you doing to get access to this data? Does collection of all of this data scare anyone? How far away are we from this data driven, AI future? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Strong Statements from Vinod Khosla at HLTH

Posted on May 16, 2018 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

Last week I had the opportunity to attend a small piece of the new HLTH conference in Las Vegas. My time at the event was cut extremely short as I had to head to Science Camp with 80 5th graders (including my daughter), but I was able to hear the opening keynotes on Sunday. I was most interested in hearing from Vinod Khosla who I don’t always agree with, but he often causes me to look at something a little different or to see the future in a new way. As usual, that’s what he delivered on stage (Between pitches for his companies of course). Here’s a look at some of the pictures and tweets I shared from Vinod’s talk at HLTH.


Needless to say, HLTH was a big event. When you pour $5 million into an event, it better be big. Not to mention the marketing they did for the event. I’m glad to not see HLTH ads on every website I visit now. The turnout for the event seemed good. I saw a lot of social media people there that I know. I was surprised by how many young people were at the conference. Maybe the CEOs they reference in their marketing were a lot of startup CEOs.


This was an extremely powerful and thought provoking statement for me. His assertion is that instead of treating people based on their symptoms, the devices and sensors we use to monitor and measure our health will be so good that these health measurements will drive medicine and not the symptoms we experience. Chew on that concept for a while and you’ll see how it’s not that far fetched even if it is still a ways away.


I’m no expert on medical education, but this does bring up some challenging questions for medical schools. In many ways, it’s similar to what I feel about elementary school for my kids. Sure, there’s a baseline of knowledge that is helpful to understand. However, when it comes to diagnosis, treatment, etc, we’re going to have to seriously consider how we train future doctors. New skills are going to be required to effectively treat a patient. I can’t imagine most medical schools are going to be ready to adapt to this change.


I tweeted this after Vinod talked about all the various tests, labs, etc he’s getting. He sees it as research and suggests that it’s not something that other people should be doing. Vinod seems to have a similar view of health testing as Mark Cuban. Mark Cuban controversial suggested that those who can afford it should do regular blood tests. Opponents argue that it drives unnecessary procedures, unnecessary health fears, and plenty of other issues from over testing. I’ve always felt like there was a balance and it was important for Vinod and Mark to understand these possibilities as they test regularly. However, having this baseline of information could be extremely valuable in discovering what really influences our health.

Some pretty interesting things to think about. Is it very practical for a health IT professional? Probably not and that’s probably why I didn’t see any health IT professionals, CIOs, or other people like that at the HLTH conference. That’s not the goal of the conference really. It seems like there will be another HLTH in 2019. Will be interesting to see what vendors return and who doesn’t.

Of course, some people got distracted at HLTH by the wedding chapel:


Then again, maybe a HLTH Wedding might be a great outcome for some people.

Practical Applications of EMR Optimization Through Clinical Decision Support – #HITsm Chat Topic

Posted on May 15, 2018 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

We’re excited to share the topic and questions for this week’s #HITsm chat happening Friday, 5/18 at Noon ET (9 AM PT). This week’s chat will be hosted by Justin Campbell (@tjustincampbell) from @GalenHealthcare on the topic of “Practical Applications of EMR Optimization Through Clinical Decision Support”


As a primer for the upcoming Health IT Expo, we will be discussing practical applications of EMR optimization through clinical decision support. Optimization dominates Health IT leaders’ list of priorities as they seek to rationalize EMR investment and harness its capabilities for improving efficiency, care and outcomes. However, boil-the-ocean approaches to EMR optimization can be counterproductive and stifle progress. Instead, Health IT leaders would be best served to focus on practical applications of optimization – specifically through clinical decision support, which serves as a lynchpin to clinical quality improvement initiatives.

Clinical decision support (CDS) provides clinicians, staff, patients or other individuals with knowledge and person-specific information, intelligently filtered or presented at appropriate times, to enhance health and health care.

CDS has a number of important benefits, including:

  • Increased quality of care and enhanced health outcomes
  • Avoidance of errors and adverse events
  • Improved efficiency, cost-benefit, and provider and patient satisfaction

CDS encompasses a variety of tools to enhance decision-making in the clinical workflow. These tools include:

  • Computerized alerts and reminders to care providers and patients
  • Clinical guidelines
  • Condition-specific order sets
  • Focused patient data reports and summaries
  • Documentation templates
  • Diagnostic support, and contextually relevant reference information

The majority of CDS applications operate as components of comprehensive EHR systems, although stand-alone CDS systems are also used. Many modern EMRs contain CDS capabilities such as rule engines, predictive modeling languages, and alert and order set authoring. However, the development and use of effective CDS within the EMR requires significant clinical, IT, and knowledge management resources that many organizations do not possess. This has led an increasing number of organizations to use compartmentalized decision support platforms other than EMR to drive portions of their CDS programs.

Ideally, CDS tools will be readily accessible to a wide array of caregivers where and when they need them, irrespective of what electronic health record they’re using. One such initiative emerging to share CDS resources is the AHRQ-funded CDS Consortium Project, which has demonstrated successfully that CDS from Partners Healthcare could be delivered to disparate EMRs across the country.

In an age of overwhelming data access and rapid technological development, ensuring clinicians have the clinical decision support tools to sift through a sea of information to find what is most relevant to their patient’s needs is vital to optimizing health outcomes.

In this tweetchat, we will discuss types of CDS (including sepsis surveillance, risk calculators, drug interaction, among others), mechanisms to deliver CDS to the point of care, workflow and alert fatigue implications, and methods for sharing proven CDS libraries.

Resources and Other EMR Optimization & CDS Reading:

  1. EMR Optimization Whitepaper
  2. EMR Optimization Infographic
  3. HealthIT.gov Clinical Decision Support
  4. CDS in the Cloud: Deploying a CDC Guideline for National Use
  5. Almost 20 Percent of CDS Alert Dismissals May Be Inappropriate
  6. EHR vendors, AHIMA push use of clinical decision support to prevent patient falls
  7. EMR Sepsis Surveillance – Achieving Optimal Sepsis Sensitivity & Specificity
  8. Integrated Health Calculators Whitepaper

Join us for this week’s #HITsm chat where we’ll discuss the following:

T1: What experiences do you have with CDS implementation? What impacts (positive and negative) did it have? #HITsm

T2: How can CDS best be deployed to the point of care without exacerbating alert fatigue? #HITsm

T3: How are different types of CDS initiatives (VTE, sepsis detection & prevention; clinical pathways implementation; risk calculation) prioritized? #HITsm

T4: Is CDS best suited to be managed by EMR vendors or can CDS be shared across vendors? How? #HITsm

T5: What are strategies to manage to CDS code and clinical peer review and rating? #HITsm

Bonus: What are mechanisms for making knowledge artifacts for CDS shareable? #HITsm

Upcoming #HITsm Chat Schedule
5/25 – TBD
Hosted by Amanda (@LALupusLady)

6/1 – #HITExpo Hiatus
The #HITsm chat will be on hiatus this week with the Health IT Expo happening in New Orleans. Please join in on the conversation happening on the #HITExpo conference hashtag.

We look forward to learning from the #HITsm community! As always, let us know if you’d like to host a future #HITsm chat or if you know someone you think we should invite to host.

If you’re searching for the latest #HITsm chat, you can always find the latest #HITsm chat and schedule of chats here.

More Than 1.1 Million Patient Records Breached During Q1 of 2018

Posted on May 14, 2018 I Written By

Anne Zieger is a healthcare journalist who has written about the industry for 30 years. Her work has appeared in all of the leading healthcare industry publications, and she's served as editor in chief of several healthcare B2B sites.

Well, this isn’t a pretty picture. According to research by Protenus, roughly 1.3 million patient records were breached between January and March of this year. (The actual number is 1,129,744 records, for those who like to be precise.)

During that quarter, the healthcare industry saw an average of at least one data breach per day, racking up 110 health data breaches during this period, according to the Protenus Breach Barometer.

The researchers found that the single largest breach taking place during Q1 2018 was an intrusion involving an Oklahoma-based healthcare organization. The breach, which exposed patient billing information for 279,856 patients, resulted from an unauthorized third-party gaining access to the health system’s network.

If you assume that the other breaches were also executed by external cyberattackers, think again. According to the data, healthcare staffers represented a far bigger risk of being involved with security violations.

The data suggests that such insiders were most likely to illegally access data on the family members, a problem which accounted for 77.1% of privacy violations in the first quarter of this year. Accessing records on coworkers was the second most common insider-related violation, followed by accessing neighbor and VIP records.

Not only that, Protenus researchers found that if a healthcare employee breaches patient privacy once, there’s a greater than 20% chance they will breach privacy again in three months’ time. Worse, there’s a greater than 54% chance they will do so again in a years’ time. That’s a pretty nasty form of compounding risk.

Not only that, do healthcare institutions catch breaches right away? According to Protenus research, it takes healthcare organizations an average of 244 days to detect breaches once they take place. As readers know, some of these events involve information being exposed to the Internet, offering private information to the public via an unprotected interface. Also pretty ugly, and also a source of lousy PR for the organization.

This research is a sobering follow-up to the company’s year-end report for 2017. Last year, according to Protenus research, there was an average of one health data breach per year in 2017. The 407 incidents it identified affected 5,579,438 patient records.

The largest breach taking place in last year involved a rogue insider, a hospital employee, who inappropriately accessed billing information on 697,800 patients. The rest of the top 10 largest data breaches largely sprang from insider errors.

Wow. If it wasn’t evident already, it’s pretty clear now that healthcare organizations need to tighten up their internal data security measures and training substantially.

While there will always be some folks who want to snoop on celebrity records to find imaging medical information on their ex, and some who plan to sell the information outright, a greater number simply need to be reminded what the rules are. (Or so I assume and fervently hope.)

How Technology Helped My Family Receive a Better Healthcare Experience

Posted on May 10, 2018 I Written By

The following is a guest blog post by Brittany Quemby, Marketing Strategist for Stericycle Communication Solutions, as part of the Communication Solutions Series of blog posts. Follow and engage with them on Twitter: @StericycleComms

Brittany Quemby - Stericycle

When was the last time you had a truly outstanding patient experience? For my family, two healthcare facilities located hours apart recently teamed up to make our lives significantly more convenient. Without modern technology, however, our new reality may never have been possible. Let’s start from the beginning.

A few years ago, my family member suffered a heart attack that caused a traumatic brain injury. He was treated at a major facility about two hours away from his home for speech therapy, occupational therapy, neurological care, cardiologist support, and more. After a year of hard work, he was discharged from the hospital and was able to move back to his home town.

Unfortunately, his community hospital was not equipped to provide the specific care he required. So for the next two years, he and his wife, who is now his primary care giver, commuted to the city multiple times a week to ensure he received the care he needed.

Eventually, we all wondered the same thing: Isn’t there a better way?

After many meetings with the facility that treated my relative and our local hospital, we started discussing how digital health experiences and virtual care could augment my family’s patient and caregiver experience. We were determined to find a solution that provided care options and choice, and allowed them to continue receiving the necessary care without the exhaustion of “living on the road.”

A recent study by Accenture said it best: “Finding the best combination of traditional in-person services and making those same services available virtually can offer consumers the choice they want in deciding when and how they receive care and support.”

Fortunately, we learned that our local hospital was equipped to provide virtual care. However, many patients had not yet taken advantage of these technologies. After some coordinating between facilities, we were able to set up ongoing virtual appointments. These appointments enabled my family member to receive care in a much more convenient setting.

With virtual appointments, they can even:

  • Easily schedule virtual appointments
  • Participate in the appointments from the comfort of a boardroom at the hospital
  • Consult with the first hospital’s specialist and also an in-person care facilitator
  • Receive follow-up health reminders and education directly after the appointment

Now, almost half of his appointments have transitioned to virtual appointments. And my family is not the only one taking advantage of this care capability. Recent research explores the many reasons why healthcare consumers are making this virtual shift:

  • One of the top three reasons why consumers tried virtual health was convenience. 37% said it was more convenient than traditional, in-person health services
  • 76% of people would have a follow-up appointment (after seeing a doctor or healthcare professional)
  • 74% would get virtual follow-up care services in their home after being hospitalized
  • 73% would discuss a specific health concern virtually with a doctor or other healthcare people and
  • 72% would be open to getting virtual daily support to manage an ongoing health issue

Consumer willingness to demand choice and becoming more involved in their health is rising. Like my family, more patients are ready to collaborate with clinicians, embrace new technologies, and explore digital health experiences that can help manage our health and create more convenient and engaging patient experiences.

Learn more about how Stericycle Communication Solutions is helping create the optimal patient experience through a combination of human and tech-enabled communication services. Check out our service overview here!

The Communication Solutions Series of blog posts is sponsored by Stericycle Communication Solutions, a leading provider of high quality live agent services, scheduling solutions, and automated messaging solutions.  Stericycle Communication Solutions provides unified human & tech-enabled communication solutions for optimized patient experiences.  Connect with Stericycle Communication Solutions on social media: @StericycleComms

Why You Shouldn’t Take Calculated Risks with Security

Posted on May 9, 2018 I Written By

The following is a guest blog post by Erin Gilmer (@GilmerHealthLaw).

Calculated risks are often lauded in innovation.  However, with increasing security breaches in the tech industry, it is time to reassess the calculated risks companies take in healthcare.

Time and again, I have advised technology companies and medical practices to invest in security and yet I am often met with resistance, a culture of calculated risk prevails.  To these companies and practices, this risk may make sense to them in the short term. Resources are often limited and so they often believe that they needn’t spend the time and money in security.  However, the notion that a company or a practice can take this chance is ill advised.

As a recent study conducted by HIMSS (and reviewed by Ann Zieger here) warns, “significant security incidents are projected to continue to grow in number, complexity and impact.” Thus in taking the calculated risk not to invest in security, companies and practices are creating greater risk for in the long run, one that comes with severe consequences.

As we have seen outside of healthcare, even “simple” breaches of user names and passwords as happened to Under Armour’s MyFitnessPal app, become relatively important use cases as examples of the impact a security breach can have. While healthcare companies typically think of this in terms of HIPAA compliance and oversight by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the consequences reach far wider.  Beyond the fines or even jail time that the OCR can impose, what these current breaches show us is how easy it is for the public to lose trust in an entity.  For a technology company, this means losing valuation which could signal a death knell for a startup. For a practice, this may mean losing patients.  For any entity, it will likely result in substantial legal fees.

Why take the risk not to invest in security? A company may think they are saving time and money up front and the likelihood of a breach or security incident is low. But in the long run, the risk is too great – no company wants to end up with their name splashed across the headlines, spending more money on legal fees, scrambling to notify those whose information has been breached, and rebuilding lost trust.  The short term gain of saving resources is not worth this risk.

The best thing a company or practice can do to get started is to run a detailed risk assessment. This is already required under HIPAA but is not always made a priority.  As the HIMSS report also discussed, there is no one standard for risk assessment and often the OCR is flexible knowing entities may be different sizes and have different resource. While encryption standards and network security should remain a high priority with constant monitoring, there are a few standard aspects of risk assessment including:

  • Identifying information (in either physical or electronic format) that may be at risk including where it is and whether the entity created, received, and/or is storing it;
  • Categorizing the risk of each type of information in terms of high, medium, or low risk and the impact a breach would have on this information;
  • Identifying who has access to the information;
  • Developing backup systems in case information is lost, unavailable, or stolen; and
  • Assessing incidence response plans.

Additionally, it is important to ensure proper training of all staff members on HIPAA policies and procedures including roles and responsibilities, which should be detailed and kept up to date in the office.

This is merely a start and should not be the end of the security measures companies and practices take to ensure they do not become the next use case. When discussing a recent $3.5 million settlement, OCR Director Roger Severino recently emphasized that, “there is no substitute for an enterprise-wide risk analysis for a covered entity.” Further, he stressed that “Covered entities must take a thorough look at their internal policies and procedures to ensure they are protecting their patients’ health information in accordance with the law.”

Though this may seem rudimentary, healthcare companies and medical practices are still not following simple steps to address security and are taking the calculated risk not to – which will likely be at their own peril.

About Erin Gilmer
Erin Gilmer is a health law and policy attorney and patient advocate. She writes about a range of issues on different forums including technology, disability, social justice, law, and social determinants of health. She can be found on twitter @GilmerHealthLaw or on her blog at www.healthasahumanright.wordpress.com.

Using Technology to Coordinate Care and Improve Outcomes in Behavioral Health – #HITsm Chat Topic

Posted on May 8, 2018 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

We’re excited to share the topic and questions for this week’s #HITsm chat happening Friday, 5/11 at Noon ET (9 AM PT). This week’s chat will be hosted by Bryan Wempen (@bryanwempen) from Netsmart on the topic of “Using Technology to Coordinate Care and Improve Outcomes in Behavioral Health.”

Technology is advancing rapidly and access to individual health and mental health data is starting to become more readily accessible to care providers; reimagining how care will be delivered and supported is a priority.  Example: mobile crisis team on the move utilizing mobile technology as they are rolling down streets and neighborhoods to assist those who need services and care the most.  In order to keep the supply of care matched to demand, it’s critical that we consider how information technology can help to extend quality care outside the four-walls of physical service locations.

As a healthcare technology professional, I’m always excited and curious to jump into a conversation about behavioral health care technology and services – exploring where an industry, ‘solution’ or program has been, where it’s at today, and what its future may bring. I look forward to hosting the #HITsm chat.

Reference Materials

Please join us for this week’s #HITsm chat as we discuss the following questions:

T1: What are some of the ways technology can be used to reduce barriers to behavioral health care and why has technology not been more widely adopted in the mental and behavioral health space? #HITsm

T2: How can technology be used to identify at-risk individuals and provide appropriate behavioral health care before need escalates? #HITsm

T3: What are some ways technology can be used to coordinate primary care and behavioral health services? #HITsm

T4: How can technology improve engagement and collaboration between patients, behavioral health service providers, payers and 3rd parties? #HITsm

T5: What is the future of coordinating care across the whole person experience (mental health, substance recovery, corrections, primary care)? #HITsm

Bonus: What are some of the challenges and nuances of integrating tele behavioral health into the outpatient setting?  #HITsm

Upcoming #HITsm Chat Schedule
5/18 – Practical Applications of EMR Optimization Through Clinical Decision Support
Hosted by Justin Campbell (@tjustincampbell) from @GalenHealthcare

5/25 – TBD
Hosted by Amanda (@LALupusLady)

6/1 – TBD
Hosted by TBD

6/8 – TBD
Hosted by TBD

6/15 – TBD
Hosted by Janice McCallum (@janicemccallum)

6/22 – TBD
Hosted by Lenny Liebmann (@LennyLiebmann)

We look forward to learning from the #HITsm community! As always, let us know if you’d like to host a future #HITsm chat or if you know someone you think we should invite to host.

If you’re searching for the latest #HITsm chat, you can always find the latest #HITsm chat and schedule of chats here.

Privacy Fears May Be Holding Back Digital Therapeutics Adoption

Posted on May 3, 2018 I Written By

Anne Zieger is a healthcare journalist who has written about the industry for 30 years. Her work has appeared in all of the leading healthcare industry publications, and she's served as editor in chief of several healthcare B2B sites.

Consumers were already afraid that their providers might not be able to protect the privacy of their health data. Given the daily news coverage of large data breaches and since the Facebook data scandal blew up, consumers may be even less likely try out new digital health approaches.

For example, a new study by innovation consultancy Enspektos has concluded that patients may be afraid to adopt digital therapeutics options. Many fear that the data might be compromised or the technology may subject them to unwanted personal surveillance.

Without a doubt, digital therapeutics could have a great future. Possibilities include technologies such as prescription drugs with embedded sensors tracking medication compliance, as well as mobile apps that could potentially replace drugs. However, consumers’ appetite for such innovations may be diminishing as consumer fears over data privacy grow.

The research, which was done in collaboration with Savvy Cooperative, found that one-third of respondents fear that such devices will be used to track their behavior in invasive ways or that the data might be sold to a third party without the permission. As the research authors note, it’s hard to argue that the Facebook affair has ratcheted up these concerns.

Other research by Enspektos includes some related points:

  • Machine-aided diagnosis is growing as AI, wearables and data analytics are combined to predict and treat diseases
  • The deployment of end-to-end digital services is increasing as healthcare organizations work to create comprehensive platforms that embrace a wide range of conditions

It’s worth noting that It’s not just consumers who are worried about new forms of hacker intrusions. Industry CIOs have been fretting as it’s become more common for cybercriminals to attack healthcare organizations specifically. In fact, just last month Symantec identified a group known as Orangeworm that is breaking into x-ray, MRI and other medical equipment.

If groups like Orangeworm have begun to attack medical devices — something cybersecurity experts have predicted for years — we’re looking at a new phase in the battle to protect hospital devices and data. If one cybercriminal decides to focus on healthcare specifically, it’s likely that others will as well.

It’s bad enough that people are worried about the downsides of digital therapeutics. If they really knew how insecure their overall medical data could be going forward, they might be afraid to even sign in to their portal again.

How Do You Make Health Data Useful to Individuals?

Posted on May 2, 2018 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

The healthcare world is flush with data and every health system seems to have a portal to access some of that data. However, far too often that data sits unused and never becomes useful for patients. At the #HIMSS18 conference, Healthcare Scene talked with Mike O’Neill, Chief Executive Officer at MedicaSoft, and Randy Farmer, Chief Operating Officer at Delaware Health Information Network (DHIN) to talk about their unique approach to the personal health record and how access to this data is beneficial to patients.

Mike and Randy address the questions of whether DHIN members find access to their data useful and in which ways they find it useful. We talk about HIE sustainability and how a proper patient portal that provides value to patients is one important element to becoming sustainable. If you want to learn more about how technology can help make data useful to individual patients, watch the video interview below:

What do you think of Medicasoft and DHIN’s approach? Do you wish more healthcare organizations and HIEs should be working similar to this? Is there something holding them back? Why haven’t most organizations embraced new technology and patient access to data? Please share your thoughts in the comments or on Twitter with @HealthcareScene and @MedicaSoftLLC

Want to find more great healthcare IT interviews, be sure to subscribe to Healthcare Scene on YouTube or peruse all of Healthcare Scene’s video interviews.

*Medicasoft is a sponsor of Healthcare Scene.

Organization Structure: Should We Break Up the Traditional Pyramid? – #HITsm Chat Topic

Posted on May 1, 2018 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

We’re excited to share the topic and questions for this week’s #HITsm chat happening Friday, 5/4 at Noon ET (9 AM PT). This week’s chat will be hosted by David Chou (@dchou1107) on the topic of “Organization Structure: Should We Break Up the Traditional Pyramid?”

One of the big challenges in healthcare is the organizational structure. As many people have been sharing recently, the organization of healthcare is producing exactly the results it was designed to produce. Does this mean it’s time for a change?

Join us for this month’s chat as we discuss healthcare’s organizational structure. We’ll look at the good and the bad parts. We’ll discuss integrated healthcare and the traditional pyramid model. Plus, we’ll discuss what things could be changed to the structure to improve healthcare.

Please join us for this week’s #HITsm chat as we discuss the following questions:

T1: Do you believe in the traditional pyramid model for healthcare? #HITsm

T2: We talk a lot about integrated care delivery but our structure is not set up in an integrated care fashion? Thoughts? #HITsm

T3: Are you seeing any unique organization model that’s different in the market currently? #HITsm

T4: If we are thinking about a different operating model who do you believe should lead this? #HITsm

T5: What type of structure would you like to see? #HITsm

Bonus: Share your worst organizational structure experience? #HITsm

Upcoming #HITsm Chat Schedule
5/11 – Using Technology to Coordinate Care and Improve Outcomes in Behavioral Health
Hosted by Bryan Wempen (@bryanwempen) from Netsmart

5/18 – Practical Applications of EMR Optimization Through Clinical Decision Support
Hosted by Justin Campbell (@tjustincampbell) from @GalenHealthcare

We look forward to learning from the #HITsm community! As always, let us know if you’d like to host a future #HITsm chat or if you know someone you think we should invite to host.

If you’re searching for the latest #HITsm chat, you can always find the latest #HITsm chat and schedule of chats here.