July 22, 2009

Marginalization of CCHIT EHR Certification

Written by: John
Sign up to receive all the latest EMR, EHR, Simulus, and Healthcare IT Updates.

If you’ve read this blog for any time, you know that I’m not a big fan of CCHIT. Certainly, I can’t argue that CCHIT EHR certification isn’t a great marketing tool for EHR vendors. However, I strongly believe that the CCHIT certification gives doctors a false hope that the CCHIT certified EMR that they select will somehow have a higher implementation success rate than another EMR. If this were true, CCHIT would be certain to be proclaiming it from every channel possible. Instead, there’s no data that this is true and it’s sad that so many doctors think it’s the case.

With that background, I was quite happy to see that the HIT Policy Committee basically marginalized CCHIT into a certifying body as opposed to a EHR certification criteria creator. I’m a little disappointed that this news hasn’t gotten more play by the various news sources and blogs. Even John Halamka basically just linked to the EHR Certification presentation with no discussion on his blog about the implications of such.

Of course, CCHIT has so far gone quiet on their blog and twitter accounts. I’m sure that pretty soon we’ll be hearing some public statements from CCHIT trying to save its certification methodology. I expect they’ll start touting their certification as better, more complete and more effective than whatever criteria HHS comes up with to satisfy ARRA’s “certified EHR” criteria.

According to Iroman on EMR Update, CCHIT did send out the following email to their list of EMR vendors:
“For providers and hospitals to have any chance of meeting ARRA incentive requirements in 2011, certified EHR technologies must be promptly available,” said Dr. Leavitt. “To do that, we will launch preliminary HHS/ARRA EHR technology certification programs in less than 90 days, drawing upon our inspection and certification experience and marketplace knowledge. Our HHS/ARRA certification will be available to modular, open source, and self developed technologies as well as comprehensive EHRs. Our current, very comprehensive certification programs — though no longer the sole route to government certification — will become even more robust to serve EHR purchasers who want maximal assurance of EHR completeness and integration.”

I bet Dr. Leavitt had to run that last line by the lawyers. I think it’s pretty clear the direction CCHIT is headed. Unfortunately, we haven’t heard the last of CCHIT EHR certification.

One other interesting anecdote about CCHIT comes from PedSource who attending the recent CCHIT meeting.

Bill Zurhellen got up and said something which drew a round of applause. “If our goal is to certify to get ARRA payments, we’re doing the wrong thing. We should be focusing on improving health care.” ML replied, “We should consider changing the mission statement to reflect healthcare outcomes and improvement…” because, right now, the mission statement is focused solely on improving HIT use.

Related Articles
  • New EHR Certification Pathways from CCHIT
  • Thoughts on the New CCHIT EHR Certification Paths
  • CCHIT Certification Poll Follow Up
  • CCHIT Certification as Default Certification
  • CCHIT Town Hall Meeting on Preliminary ARRA Certified EHR

  • Tags:

    Look for similar articles under these categories: 

    6 responses to "Marginalization of CCHIT EHR Certification"

    1. # Charles Penoi commented on July 22nd, 2009:

      This is about healthcare doing what works and what is needed and doing it consistently hand in hand with prevention. It’s not about certification, incentives or vendors that can’t get out of their own way. Physicians, will, hopefully, turn to a focus on what drives medical value and insist on improvements where that value is not being delivered. Let’s all make medical value ‘the point of the spear’. Doctors don’t need to learn technology so much as, we, the technologists and vendors, need to understand medical value.

    2. # Will HHS Do Any Better at EHR Certification Than CCHIT? | EMR and HIPAA pingbacked on July 22nd, 2009:

      [...] « Previous article Marginalization of CCHIT EHR Certification Next article [...]

    3. # Certified EHRs? What Are They Gets Defined Tomorrow « Chilmark Research pingbacked on August 13th, 2009:

      [...] head. Arguably one of the more significant statements the workgroup made (among many) was that certification should be pluralistic, thus not allowing any single entity (e.g., CCHIT) to be a choke-hold on certification. This was [...]

    4. # Craig Veach commented on November 6th, 2009:

      Have any other companies or organizations announced that they have plans to become a “Certifying Body” to offer the same service as CCHIT?

    5. # John commented on November 6th, 2009:

      Hey Craig,
      We just posted about the first organization to compete with CCHIT in EHR certification: http://www.emrandhipaa.com/emr-and-hipaa/2009/11/03/new-ehr-certifying-body-drummond-group/ I think we might get a few more. We’ll see.

    6. # Craig Veach commented on November 6th, 2009:

      Thank you very much for your help. This is what I was looking for.

    Leave a Reply
    Commenting policy: Some comments run the risk of being deleted. These include comments that are spam or cannot be understood or are rude.
    You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
  • Simplify MD EMR

    EMR Selection Book

  • Top - Home