July 20, 2009
Meaningful Use Gets More Complex
Written by: John- CCHIT Certification
- EHR
- Electronic Health Record
- Electronic Medical Record
- EMR
- HealthCare IT
- Meaningful Use
I posted previously a short summary of the changes to meaningful use in the final meaningful use matrix presented at the HIT policy committee meeting. As I’ve thought about these changes this weekend, I couldn’t help but remember the major problem I (and many others) had with the original meaningful use criteria being too complex.
My argument then was that the 22 meaningful use criteria as a collective whole were too much for a doctor’s office to complete in the current time frame. Unfortunately, it seems that the HIT policy committee has chosen to only make slight simplifications of the meaningful use matrix for hospitals (For inpatient CPOE, only 10% of orders must be entered electronically) and has actually added to the EMR requirements for ambulatory clinics.
I do think they’ve made a wise choice on marginalizing CCHIT for the “certified EHR” requirement, but I wonder how many doctors are going to be able to meet this lengthy laundry list of EMR requirements to show meaningful use. You should have seen the faces on the doctors I presented to as I briefly listed the meaningful use requirements. Far too many deer in headlights and people shaking their heads.
Of course, the government has one thing on their side. Many won’t look into the details of what’s required to show meaningful use and will implement an EMR not having a full knowledge of what will be required of them to actually get the EHR stimulus payments. Maybe EHR adoption will increase thanks to the stimulus money and very little of the money will actually be spent.
Related ArticlesLook for similar articles under these categories:
5 responses to "Meaningful Use Gets More Complex"
Leave a Reply
- » Recent articles
- More Meaningful Use Stage 1 Numbers from 2011
- HIMSS 12 New Media Meetup – Sponsored by simplifyMD
- Large EHR Vendor Recommendation
- Interoperability versus Usability in Best of Breed or All-in-One HIS Systems
- Meaningful Use Appeals Process – Meaningful Use Monday
- Kaiser’s Mobile App, EHR Anxiety Coding, EHR Accessibility Challenge and EHR Design
- Social Media ROI for Doctors
- GE Centricity Advance Ceasing Operations
- Real-Time Analytics and Dashboards for Streamlining Revenue Cycle Automation
- Patients Medical Record Posted to Facebook – HIPAA Violation
- Health Care Administration - MHA Programs
- » Archive Calendar
-
Jobs by SimplyHired
John,
You are exactly right–the deer in the headlights look is what we regularly see. 99% of our sales cycle is spent educating doctors on what is available in the market and what constitutes a “qualified EMR” and what will constitute “meaningful use.” For the most part, physicians haven’t spent much time looking at these matrices or even thinking about how to get started.
Spreading the word on this stuff is as difficult as implementing an EMR and it seems that even with the right software, practices will have just as tough a time proving “meaningful use”.
–Muhammad
One doctor gave this greedy grin and said amongst clenched teeth, “Tell me how to get all that government money.” I just smiled since so many people are looking at the pile of money and forgetting everything else.
“Meaningful Use” is great!
The definition and regs will evolve toward complexity. So companies called “MU Certifiers” will manage MU certification. HHS will contract with MUCs to certify doctors, who will pay a fee to MUCs to insulate them from the regulatory complexity and complete all required forms.
After the MUCs relay certifications to HHS, doctors will get their ARRA money.
Problem solved.
[...] I’m still on my kick of asking the question of why we’re making the definition of meaningful use so complicated. Certainly I could make an ambitious goal of every doctor having to document everything granularly [...]
Burlap,
Are you planning to start an MUC to help doctors out with this?