January 14, 2009
Obama Wants Full EHR by 2014
Written by: JohnSign up to receive all the latest EMR, EHR, Simulus, and Healthcare IT Updates.
Obama has held very strong on his commitment of $10 billion a year for 5 years in health care. Obama’s set the audacious goal of full digital health records by 2014. The question is if it’s even possible to invest that much money in health care IT in such a short period and will we be able to reach the goal of full EHR by 2014.
A recent CNN Money article pointed out some important problems with investing so much in health care IT. The biggest of these is finding enough qualified IT professionals that can navigate the complex health care IT systems. There really is a lack of qualified health care IT professionals. Some jobs I’ve seen listed for EMR professionals have gone unfilled for months just because they couldn’t find qualified candidates.
Many reports are also suggesting hundreds of thousands of jobs will be created by this investment in health care IT. This of course would be true if you had enough people to fill those jobs. It’s hard enough for an IT professional to move into health care IT. It will take a lot more training for a blue collar worker to try and implement an electronic medical record.
Certainly it’s not impossible for someone to learn from scratch. I know, because I did it myself. However, it is literally like learning to talk a different language. It takes a lot of work and training and a unique person who can balance the IT needs, the health care requirements, with the business requirements.
I also think that it’s sad to say that $50 billion might be enough to achieve the goal of interoperable EHR by 2014. A look at a small Massachusetts Example gives a good measure of what it will actually cost:
Massachusetts has developed a plan to fully computerize records at its 14,000 physicians’ offices by 2012 and its 63 hospitals by 2014. After a pilot program, the state legislature estimates it will cost about $340 million to build the statewide computer system, with a cost of about $2 million per hospital.
“[Obama's] timeframe is very ambitious, but there is a need to be able to track data on patients and talk across providers and health care systems,” said Dr. JudyAnn Bigby, Secretary of Health and Human Services for Massachusetts. “The program will allow for greater patient safety.”
Despite being less than what might be needed, it certainly would give it a good start that could build into the future.
I’m still planning on writing a few words about whether I think the investment is worthwhile or not. However, I think it’s important to have as much of an understanding as possible at the goals Obama has proposed for investment in IT for health care.
Related ArticlesLook for similar articles under these categories:
4 responses to "Obama Wants Full EHR by 2014"
Leave a Reply
- EMR - Sequelmed
- EHR - Sequelmed
- Drugs for Sale - The Drug Company
- » Recent articles
- EMR Documentation by Exception or Veracity
- Imagine an EMR World…
- US Airways “Sully” Sullenberger to Speak at HIMSS
- Government Makes Meaningful Use Comments Public
- HHS Evaluating Harmful Unintended Consequences of HITECH Act
- Instance Where Guaranteed EMR Stimulus Money Gets Nothing
- Greenway EMR Resource List
- Has EMR Helped?
- EMR and HIPAA Readers
- Q&A: ARRA EMR Stimulus Money for Non Medicare Providers
- » Archive Calendar
-
Jobs by SimplyHired
As a solo family physician, I simply cannot afford the typical 20,000+ price of an EMR. Keep in mind we need billing software, scheduling software, multiple phone lines, rent, not to mention payroll, payroll taxes, malpractice, business insurance, electricity, water, and on and on. I’d love to adopt EHR if it were user-friendly, comprehensive, adaptive, and cost-efficient. While I’m not big on government control, how about simply provide all offices with VistA (like the VA) and be done with it.
Dr. Carter,
I personally just find it really unfortunate that you don’t know that there are a ton of EMR software out now that don’t have a $20,000+ price tag. Certainly there are plenty of those, but there are also some EMR software with new billing methods. Anywhere from free (see my other posts on free EMR) and pay per month or even pay per visit.
I find it completely ironic that you said you wanted an EHR that is “user-friendly, comprehensive, adaptive, and cost-efficient” and then suggested that government provide Vista to doctors. From everything I’ve heard about Vista, those 2 things sound like polar opposites to me. I have heard very good things about availability of records by having one system (ie. Vista at the VA). However, I’ve heard far too many end users complain about Vista being one of the worst programs they’ve ever used and the back end Mumps “database” (which most doctors don’t care about) is painful to work with and a complete liability to the future of Vista.
I will say that I’m very sympathetic to your plight Dr. Carter. How can a doctor really know that there are “user-friendly, comprehensive, adaptive, and cost-efficient” EHR out there when there are over 400 EHR companies out there to consider? The answer of course is that they can’t unless they have a consultant they really trust or they invest a ton of time finding the right one. Even then, it’s a huge challenge for them to find a system that will work well for them.
I hope you’ll at least do a little more research on some of the unique payment models available with many EMR companies before you assume they’ll all cost you $20k. I think you’ll also find that those that have creative pricing models are also the ones that are usually more “user-friendly, comprehensive, adaptive, and cost-efficient.” They have to be to survive.
[...] the stimulus package to law setting aside $19.2 billion for healthcare IT alone to reach a goal of full EHR by 2014 promising hundreds of thousands of new jobs by boosting healthcare, the question “How is it [...]
[...] been writing quite a bit lately about Obama’s investment in EMR and healthcare IT. I find the topic completely fascinating and so I expect I’ll be writing a lot more about [...]