Free EMR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to EMR and HIPAA for FREE!!

Electronic Prescribing Of Controlled Substances Rates Spiking

Posted on September 1, 2016 I Written By

Anne Zieger is a healthcare journalist who has written about the industry for 30 years. Her work has appeared in all of the leading healthcare industry publications, and she's served as editor in chief of several healthcare B2B sites.

Back in the day, say a decade ago or so, when e-prescribing itself was a new and big deal, the feds – especially the DEA – didn’t think much of the e-prescribing of controlled drugs like opiates. But a few years later the agency eventually came around. In June of 2010, it released a rule which allowed providers to issue such prescriptions nd pharmacies to receive, dispense and archive these scripts electronically nationwide.

Since then, electronic prescribing of controlled substances (EPCS) has taken off, according to a story in Search HealthIT. In fact, EPCS has been growing rapidly, particularly during 2015, according to national pharmacy IT network Surescripts.

Specifically, the number of ECPS transactions shot up 600% last year, from 1.67 million to 12.8 million scripts issued, according to Surescripts’ 2015 National Progress Report. Part of the reason for this surge is that providers are getting on board at a brisk pace. The number of providers enabled to use EPCS grew 359% last year.

Among the interesting stats to be culled from the Surescripts report is that 32% of drugs prescribed were opioids. This statistic should draw a lot of interest from public officials and enforcement agencies trying to stem the tide of opioid overdoses which killed more than 28,000 Americans in 2014. That’s four times as many who died of this cause in 2010, according to Surescripts’ sources.

A Drop in the Bucket

It’s worth noting that the number of EPCS transactions still pales in contrast to the number of transactions hosted on the Surescripts network that year. The network handled 9.7 billion transactions in 2015, up 40% from the previous year, the company reported. That means the EPCS is still a drop in the bucket overall.

Also, levels of EPCS-enabled pharmacies and physicians vary across the U.S. For example, 91% of pharmacies are EPCS-enabled in New York, the top state for such pharmacies. (A New York State rule requiring every practitioner in the state to e-prescribe all medications went into effect in March.) Other top-ranked states for pharmacy penetration included Massachusetts, California and Texas. On the other hand, only 73% of pharmacies were EPCS-enabled in Georgia and Florida.

Still, with adoption levels seemingly evening out between states – and the gap small enough to close over the next few years – it seems like EPCS is becoming an established practice. Surescripts contends that this is for the best, and argues that EPCS reduces fraud and improper prescribing by making it easier to track such medications. And with states like New York mandating e-prescribing for all providers, the growth in EPCS is likely to stay healthy.

However, for every action there’s a reaction, and the other shoe may not have dropped where EPCS risks are concerned. It may take a few years to find out whether the confidence some have in this approach was merited.

Prescription Benefits’ Information Silos Provide Feedstock for RxEOB

Posted on June 7, 2016 I Written By

Andy Oram is an editor at O'Reilly Media, a highly respected book publisher and technology information provider. An employee of the company since 1992, Andy currently specializes in open source, software engineering, and health IT, but his editorial output has ranged from a legal guide covering intellectual property to a graphic novel about teenage hackers. His articles have appeared often on EMR & EHR and other blogs in the health IT space. Andy also writes often for O'Reilly's Radar site (http://oreilly.com/) and other publications on policy issues related to the Internet and on trends affecting technical innovation and its effects on society. Print publications where his work has appeared include The Economist, Communications of the ACM, Copyright World, the Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Vanguardia Dossier, and Internet Law and Business. Conferences where he has presented talks include O'Reilly's Open Source Convention, FISL (Brazil), FOSDEM, and DebConf.

In health care, silos between industries prevent synergies like in the travel industry, where you can order your hotel, flight, rental car, and tourist sights all in one place. Interoperability–the Holy Grail of much health care policy, throughout the Meaningful Use and MACRA eras–is just one sliver of the information hoarding problem. There is much more to integrated care, and prescriptions illustrate the data exchange problems in spades. Pharmacist Robert Oscar recognized the business possibilities inherent in breaking through the walls, and formed RxEOB 15 years ago to address them.

RxEOB helps patients and their physicians make better decisions about medications, taking costs and other interests into account. Sold to health insurance plans and benefits managers, it’s an information management platform and a communication platform, viewing patients, health plans, physicians, pharmacists, and family members as team members.

It’s instructive to look at the various players in the prescription space, what data each gives to RxEOB, and what RxEOB provides to each in return.

Payers

These organizations have lots of data that’s useful in the RxEOB ecosystem: costs, formularies, and coverage information. What payers often lack is information such as price, benefit status, and tier for drugs “similar to” one that is being prescribed.

The “similar to” concept is central to the pharmaceutical field, from the decision made by drug companies to pursue research, through FDA approval (they want proof that a new medication is substantially better than ones it is similar to), to physician choices and payer coverage. There may be good reasons to prescribe a medication that costs more than ones to which it is similar: the patient may not be responding to other drugs, or may be suffering from debilitating side effects. Still, everyone should know what the alternatives are.

Physicians

One of RxEOB’s earliest services was simply to inform doctors about the details of the health care coverage their patients had. This is gradually becoming an industry function, but is still an issue. Nowadays, thanks to electronic health records, most physicians theoretically have access to all the information they need to prescribe thoughtfully. But the information they want may be buried in databases or unstructured documents, jumbled together with irrelevant details. RxEOB can extract and combine information on available drugs, formularies, authorization requirements, coverage information, and details such as patient drug histories to help the doctor make a quick, accurate decision.

Pharmacies

These can use RxEOB’s information on the benefits and cost coverage offered by health insurance for the patients they serve.

Benefits managers

These staff know a lot about patients’ benefits, which they provide to RxEOB. In return, RxEOB can help them set up portals and use text messaging or mobile apps to communicate to patients.

Consumers

Finally we come to the much-abused patients, who have the greatest stake in the whole system and are the least informed. The consumer would like to know everything that the rest of the system knows about pricing, alternatives, and coverage. And the consumer wants to know more: why they should take the drug in the first place, for instance, how to deal with side effects. RxEOB provides communication channels between the patient and all the other players. Thus, the company contributes to medication adherence.

RxEOB is a member of the National Council of Prescription Drug Programs (NCPDP) which works on standards for such things as prior authorizations and communications. Thus, while carving out a successful niche in a dysfunctional industry, it is helping to move the industry to a better place in data sharing.

ePrescribing of Controlled Substance (EPCS) Now Allowed Nationwide

Posted on September 1, 2015 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

This is really exciting news. Especially for me since the only post I’ve ever taken down after it was published was a post I did about an FDA pilot of controlled substances on September 13, 2009. It turns out the press release I got was premature and so I took down the post since it wasn’t accurate information. About 6 years later (technically the DEA first proposed the rule in 2008), we finally have ePrescribing of controlled substance available in all 50 states.

Surescripts put together this great animated gif to celebrate the occasion.

We still have some work to do to get every doctor on board with ePrescribing, let alone ePrescribing controlled substances, but we’re getting there. In fact, I suggested today at me EHR workshop in Dubai that ePrescribing has been one of the most successful standards in healthcare. Can you think of any other healthcare standard that’s been more successful? HL7 lab data comes close, but I still take ePrescribing.

How long until we have near 100% adoption of ePrescibing? Any predictions?

EMRs and Patient Satisfaction

Posted on August 7, 2013 I Written By

James Ritchie is a freelance writer with a focus on health care. His experience includes eight years as a staff writer with the Cincinnati Business Courier, part of the American City Business Journals network. Twitter @HCwriterJames.

When it comes to keeping patients happy, EMRs matter, a new study suggests.

More patients are logging on to access their own records – and they tend to like it, according to data from research firms Aeffect and 88 Brand Partners. About 24 percent of patients have used EMRs for tasks such as checking test results, ordering medication refills and making appointments. And 78 percent of those patients reported being satisfied with their doctors, compared with 68 percent of those who hadn’t used EMRs.

“EMR users are telling us that they are more confident in the coordination of care they’re being provided, and think more highly of their doctors, simply because of the information technology in use,” Michael McGuire, director of strategy for Chicago-based 88 Brand Partners, said in a press release.

Patient satisfaction is fast becoming a top priority in health care as it determines a growing portion of providers’ reimbursement. So far, it’s mainly been an issue for hospitals. Their patient satisfaction survey results make up 30 percent of  their quality score in Medicare’s “value-based purchasing” program, part of the Affordable Care Act. In fiscal 2013, hospitals saw 1 percent of their Medicare reimbursement put at risk based on the overall score, which also considers performance on clinical measures. The figure will increase to 2 percent by fiscal 2017. Private insurers are also starting to link payments with quality scores.

The trend is now taking hold outpatient clinics, as well. About 2 percent of primary-care doctors’ compensation is tied to patient satisfaction measures, and the figure is likely to grow in coming years, according to a recent report from the Medical Group Management Association. Specialist physicians reported, on average, that 1 percent of their salary hinged on patient satisfaction.

Patients cited several reasons for preferring that their doctors use EMRs, according to the EMR Patient Impact Study from Aeffect and 88 Brand Partners. Among them were ease of access to information and the perceived clarity and thoroughness of communication that the records systems provide. And adoption rates could be set to go higher: 52 percent of survey respondents said they aren’t using an EMR yet, but would be interested in trying one. Only 18 percent said they had no interest.

A host of other factors, such as level of attention and ease of making appointments, also factored into patient satisfaction, according to the survey of 1,000 consumers. But for doctors who have implemented EMRs, getting their patients to log on might be a simple way to create a more loyal following. In many cases, according to the survey, EMR-using patients had adopted the technology after being encouraged by a physician.

Develop Your Own EMR – You’re Still Crazy!

Posted on July 1, 2013 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

One of my favorite posts ever I created back in May 2006. It was titled, “Develop Your Own EMR – Are You Crazy?” In the post, I make a couple of high level observations about why you shouldn’t develop your own EMR. The first is the sheer volume of EMR features you have to create. All of the individual modules are quite easy, but when you add up all of the functions that are required in an EMR, the volume is overwhelming. The second is the need to continually add new features to the EMR. The EMR development is never over and if you stop developing your own EMR, you get behind really quickly.

7 years later, you’re still crazy to develop your own EMR. Certainly the technology is better today than it was back then. However, the volume of features and functions you need in your EMR has grown exponentially. If you decide to develop your own EMR, you’re going to be even farther behind.

I understand why it’s really tempting for a clinic to want to develop their own EMR. It’s a beautiful idea to think about creating a piece of software that perfectly matches your workflow. Of course, if you’re in a practice with more than one provider, then you’ll have to start making compromises with your colleagues to match their workflow as well. Not an easy task. If you ask 6 doctors to describe their clinical workflow, you’ll get 36 answers. That’s a developers nightmare.

My previous post also asserts that there are a lot of good EMR companies out there. I think this is even more true today than it was back then. In fact, back then was just the start of the EMR pricing revolution. Today the challenge is more a paradox of choice as opposed to a lack of good options.

Turns out, there are still plenty of crazy people out there that are willing to start developing their own EMR. In fact, many of the EMR software we see in existence today was because a crazy doctor decided he wanted something better. I’m sure many more will continue this trend.

I would offer one time where you might not be as crazy to develop your own EMR. If you’re crazy enough to eschew Medicare, Medicaid and insurance, then you might be wise to develop your own EMR. Once you take out the complexity of reimbursement and instead focus on patient care, the EMR becomes much simpler. Plus, no EMR vendor has focused their EMR on patient care instead of billing. Plus, the advanced features that you might need, will also be available from third parties. For example, if you want ePrescribing, you can integrate it with a third party company. This will be true for more and more advanced EMR features.

Many people have asked me why I haven’t developed my own EMR. My question to them is, “do you think I’m crazy?” I’m actually afraid to hear the answer.

One-Fifth Of Physician Practices Might Switch EMRs

Posted on February 26, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is a healthcare journalist who has written about the industry for 30 years. Her work has appeared in all of the leading healthcare industry publications, and she's served as editor in chief of several healthcare B2B sites.

Here’s yet more evidence that this is the year of the “big switch” in EMRs, at least among physicians. A new survey by Black Book Market Research has concluded that about 23 percent of practices with currently implemented EMRs are unhappy enough with their current system to consider switching to a different vendor.

According to a piece in Medical Economics, doctors’ concerns include a lack of interoperability, excessively complicated connectivity and networking and problems with mobile device integration.

The survey, which reached out to 17,000 doctors, found that internal medicine docs had the highest rates of satisfaction (89 percent), followed  by family practice (85 percent), general practice (82 percent) and pediatrics.

The unhappiest specialists were nephrologists (88 percent), followed closely by urologists (85 percent) and ophthalmologists (80 percent).

So if a practice is going to switch vendors, what are they looking for? The Medical Economics piece listed five “must-have” features doctors voted for in the Black Book survey:

* vendor viability

* data integration and network sharing

* adoption of mobile devices

* health information exchange support and connectivity

* perfected interfaces with lab, pharmacy, radiology, medical billing partners, and others

Unfortunately, they won’t find it easy to find all of these features in a single EMR.  Of course, you faithful editor isn’t the be-all and end-all when it comes to EMR products (who could be?) but it seems to me that if even pricier enterprise products seldom offer all of these options, it’s decidedly unlikely that ambulatory products will. (OK, vendor viability is a judgment call, but in a world where so many practices don’t like their EMR, it’s hard to imagine that vendors are at their strongest.)

Folks, the truth is that it looks like we’re coming to a market crash of some kind. Physicians aren’t getting what they need from EMRs, but vendors aren’t keeping up, especially in the realm of specialty EMRs.

As if that wasn’t enough, the threat of fines looms for practices that don’t get their Meaningful Use act together, something they may have trouble doing if they’re in the midst of EMR shopping, installation and adoption.

Time is getting tight, and customers aren’t happy. Ambulatory vendors, what’s your next move?

New Opportunities to Avoid ePrescribing Penalty for 2013 – Meaningful Use Monday

Posted on November 5, 2012 I Written By

Lynn Scheps is Vice President, Government Affairs at EHR vendor SRSsoft. In this role, Lynn has been a Voice of Physicians and SRSsoft users in Washington during the formulation of the meaningful use criteria. Lynn is currently working to assist SRSsoft users interested in showing meaningful use and receiving the EHR incentive money.

According to the 2013 Medicare Final Rule released last week, there are new ways to avoid future payment adjustments under the MIPPA ePrescribing rule for those who have not already taken the necessary steps to avoid them: 1) The exemption request period has been reopened and 2) meaningful use will satisfy the ePrescribing requirements according to specific timetables.

1) CMS is offering a second chance to physicians who missed the June 30 deadline for requesting an exemption to the 2013 ePrescribing penalty (1.5%) under the original 4 categories. Between November 1, 2012 and January 31, 2013, physicians can go to the Quality Reporting Communication Support Page and request an exemption based on one of the following justifications:

  • Inability to electronically prescribe due to local, State, or Federal law or regulation (i.e., prescribe predominantly controlled substances)
  • Prescribed fewer than 100 prescriptions between January 1 and June 30, 2012
  • Insufficient high speed internet access (i.e., rural area)
  • Insufficient available pharmacies that accept electronic prescribing.

2) In the interest of harmonizing the various government programs that contain ePrescribing components, CMS now will provide two additional ways to avoid the 2013 MIPPA penalties:

  • Achieve meaningful use during 2013
  • Demonstrate intent to participate in the EHR Incentive Program and adopt Certified EHR Technology by January 31, 2013

This information will be retrieved by CMS from the information in its EHR Incentive Program’s Registration and Attestation System, rather than by having providers request an exemption as in #1 above.

Final Rule for Stage 2 Brings Some Changes to Stage 1 – Meaningful Use Monday

Posted on September 10, 2012 I Written By

Lynn Scheps is Vice President, Government Affairs at EHR vendor SRSsoft. In this role, Lynn has been a Voice of Physicians and SRSsoft users in Washington during the formulation of the meaningful use criteria. Lynn is currently working to assist SRSsoft users interested in showing meaningful use and receiving the EHR incentive money.

Lynn Scheps is Vice President, Government Affairs at EHR vendor SRSsoft. In this role, Lynn has been a Voice of Physicians and SRSsoft users in Washington during the formulation of the meaningful use criteria. Lynn is currently working to assist SRSsoft users interested in showing meaningful use and receiving the EHR incentive money. Check out Lynn’s previous Meaningful Use Monday posts.

Although Stage 2 requirements don’t become effective until 2014, the Final Rule for Stage 2 contains some changes that apply—or can apply—to providers before then, and some that will apply to all physicians in 2014, even those still in Stage 1. These changes fall into 3 categories in terms of timing:  those that are effective in 2013, those that can be adopted in 2013 at the physician’s discretion, and those that are implemented in 2014.

Effective 2013:

  • Conducting a test of the EHR’s capability to exchange clinical information (Stage 1 Core Measure 14) will be dropped from the requirements. It will be replaced in Stage 2 by measures that require actual and ongoing exchange of information.
  • A new exclusion for the ePrescribing requirement is being added for physicians who have no pharmacy within 10 miles that accepts electronic prescriptions.

At Physician’s Discretion in 2013 (and required in 2014):

  • The Vital Signs measure will be restructured to separate the reporting of height and weight from the reporting of blood pressure. This is good news for those specialists who consider some, but not all 3 of the vital signs, relevant to their practice. Along with this change in the measure are revised minimum ages: blood pressure reporting will be required for patients age 3 and over instead of age 2, and height (or length) and weight will be required for all patients, even those under 2.
  • An alternate calculation for CPOE will help physicians—again, likely specialists—who do not prescribe frequently enough to meet the Stage 1 (30%) threshold. The denominator will be limited to “medication orders created by the EP during the EHR reporting period,” instead of “unique patients with at least one medication in their medication list.”

Effective 2014:

  • Currently, in Stage 1, if a provider attests to an exclusion for any menu measures, these measures can be counted towards the menu requirement. In Stage 2, this will no longer be true—excluded measures will not satisfy the menu requirement if there are other measures on which the provider could report instead. This will also apply to providers who are still reporting under Stage 1 in 2014—a change which those providers will likely perceive as inequitable since it did not apply to the earlier attesters. Those physicians who qualify for multiple exclusions—specialists, once again—will find that the menu set is really no longer a menu, as they will be left with few, if any, choices. 

So, while physicians do not have to focus on Stage 2 just yet, they should consider whether they might benefit from the 2013 changes described above.

MU Stage 2, ICD-10 Delay, Epic-Related Safety Errors, and Mobile EMRs – Around HealthCare Scene

Posted on August 26, 2012 I Written By

Katie Clark is originally from Colorado and currently lives in Utah with her husband and son. She writes primarily for Smart Phone Health Care, but contributes to several Health Care Scene blogs, including EMR Thoughts, EMR and EHR, and EMR and HIPAA. She enjoys learning about Health IT and mHealth, and finding ways to improve her own health along the way.

EMR Thoughts

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Final Rule Published

The long awaited MU Stage 2 final rule was published last week by CMS. No one will be required to follow the requirements until 2014, when the program is set to begin. The Stage 2 final rule is 672 pages long. The press release concerning MU Stage 2 mentions interesting facts, such as 3,300 hospitals have participated thus far.

ICD-10 Delay Finalized with New Unique Plan Identifier

In an announcement that was kind of lost in the midst of the meaningful use stage 2 final rule, the ICD-10 delay is official. As someone said on Twitter, you now have two years to get ready for ICD-10. You better get started now. The announcement of a Health Plan Identifier (HPID) is also very big news.

EMR and EHR

Nurses Raise Alarm Over Epic-Related Safety Errors

With any EMR, there is an adjustment period. However, there was an error recently at a prison clinic in California that could have been deadly that was related to the implementing of an Epic installation. Nurses have raised many concerns about the system, and have likely not been adequately trained. Is the issue with Epic because of the system, or because of inadequate training?

We Know What’s Right, but It’s Hard
Being healthy and overcoming illnesses takes works. And obviously, most of us know that if we don’t put in that effort, there will be negative consequences. Unfortunately, many people don’t put in that effort. Luckily, with the advent of being able to monitor health from home with smart phone apps and other gadgets, it is easier to do what we know is right. Is mHealth applications the answer to the question of how do we motivate ourselves to do what we know we should?

Happy EMR Doctor

Can We Talk? Challenges of SaaS Type EMR User Interfaces

SaaS EMR User Interfaces have a variety of challenges. The latest issue is ensuring that all the individual software work together in a way that doesn’t interrupt a practice’s workflow. This week, Dr. Michael West talks about how, when one component gets updated, it often causes others to work less efficiently. His office recently experienced this, and described the frustrating experience.

Smart Phone Health Care

Detecting Parkinson’s with a Phone Call

About 5 percent of adults over the age of 80 has Parkinson’s Disease. A new technology is being developed that supposedly can detect Parkinson’s Disease. And not only can it detect it, but with 98.6 percent overall accuracy. This raises the question, what can a smart phone not do? This is just the beginning of disease detection and treatment with smart phones. What’s next?

Five Health Communities Every Patient Should Use

It’s easier than ever to have a health problem. Okay, not really, but it’s easier to find support. There are many great communities online dedicated to helping patient’s find information about just about every health topic out there. Some offer free advice from medical professionals, and others implement social media. Here are five of the best communities everyone should join.

Hospital EMR and EHR

Survey: Virtually All Docs Want Mobile EMRs

9 out of 10 doctors want to be able to access their EMR on a mobile device, according to a recent study. It makes sense, since so many doctors are using iPads and smart phones nowadays. Luckily for these doctors, companies like Vitera and eClinicalWorks are working on mobile solutions for this. Hopefully these solutions will include things like reviewing and updating patient charts, and ordering prescriptions, which ranked among the top functions doctors are hoping a mobile EMR would include.

Global eHealth Olympics, LifeArmor, and Meaningful Use Stage 3 Draft: Around HealthCare Scene

Posted on August 12, 2012 I Written By

Katie Clark is originally from Colorado and currently lives in Utah with her husband and son. She writes primarily for Smart Phone Health Care, but contributes to several Health Care Scene blogs, including EMR Thoughts, EMR and EHR, and EMR and HIPAA. She enjoys learning about Health IT and mHealth, and finding ways to improve her own health along the way.

Time to take a quick look at some of the interesting posts happening on the other Healthcare Scene blogs. I think you’ll enjoy many of the posts.

EMR and EHR

Would Meaningful Use Go Away Under a Romney Presidency

With the November presidential election quickly approaching, there are many questions floating around. With Mitt Romney’s desire to repeal ObamaCare, some are wondering if he will try and stop HITECH as well. And if so, what is the fate of Meaningful Use.

Global eHealth Olympics

While the 2012 Olympics in London have been on the minds of many across the world for the past two weeks, Blair Butterfield suggested another sort of Olympics — one comparing the health care of different countries. He asks the question, “What if we compared our healthcare system to those of Europe, Asia and the Middle East in terms of areas like integration, communication and population health? How would the U.S. fare?” This post contains ideas for the different “events” that might occur in an eHealth Olympics, as well as suggestions for the top contenders for each category.

Meaningful Health IT News

Colbert Lampoons Proteus Digital Pill

The Proteus digital pill has gotten a lot of attention since it was announced. Included in that attention was a bit about it on the Colbert Report. It’s a spoof, of course, but somewhat entertaining. As Neil Versel says, “At least Colbert’s version featured a wireless tablet computer.

Smart Phone Health Care

LifeArmor Created for Military Families for Coping with Stress

A mobile app created by the Department of Defense aims to help military families cope with different issues. It addresses 17 topics, including depression and post-traumatic stress. The app takes content from the D0D website, AfterDeployment, and has videos and assessments. The app is free.

Several Pharmacies Offer Online Services for Patients

In-store pharmacies have started offering online services to make re-filling and transferring prescriptions easier than ever. Target and Walgreens are among those stores, and there are positives and negatives to using these services. Have you switched to online management of prescriptions?

Hospital EMR and EHR

Population Health Management is No Fad

Is population health management a fad, or is it here to stay? Anne references a recent column by Information Week by Paul Cerrato, where he states that it is. However, while she agrees that Cerrato’s column was “well-argued,” she disagrees with the suggestion.

Meaningful Use Stage 3 Draft On The Way

Although the MU Stage 2 final draft hasn’t been released yet, the draft regulations for stage 3 are apparently going to be released in August. Healthcare Informatics suggested a list of recommendations that are likely to be in stage 3, such as tracking individual care goals, and track tracks/steps and responsible party.